Judges told not to call gypsies, wait for it...... Gypsies

Judges have been told not to call Gypsies, "Gypsies" because of the potential to offend the so called travelling community. The guidelines are produced by the judicial studies board, to comply with the Equality bill.

Leaders from the Gypsy community have highlighted the fact that Gypsies are actually proud of being labelled as gypsies.

By labelling Gypsies as the travelling community, the judicial system is ignoring the fact that there are different races within the Gypsy community.

This is yet another example of the Marxist elements in influential positions within the state, using Orwellian big brother style re-education programs.

In the guide ( equal treatment bench book) judges and magistrates are warned they must ‘recognise and eliminate’ their personal prejudices. The book provides a list of people who may be ‘socially and economically disadvantaged’ and need special help to ensure they are treated fairly.

These are listed as ethnic minorities, minority faith groups, people with disabilities, women, children, older people, gays and lesbians, transgender people and ‘those who through poverty or for any other reason are socially or economically marginalised’.

Yet again sensitivities of the minority must ride rough shod over the wishes of the majority indigenous population of this nation. Many in this country are fed up with the gypsy community moving on to their village greens and supermarket car parks, and the police being powerless to remove them, because of laws such as the Equality Bill.

I never thought I would I would ever hear myself saying this, but well done to the French. Who in September started to deport some of the Roma Gypsy community because of a shocking 358% increase in Gypsy related crime. Obviously the over used and farcical Nazi smear was used against the French nation, specifically by the far left EU chief Viviane Reding, who called on the EU to impose sanctions of France for this perfectly legal deportation action.

The legal status of Gypsies from Romania and Bulgaria — who are the centre of the storm — is governed by EU regulations which state that if a non-Schengen area national has been in an EU state for more than three months and has no job or no proof of substantial means on which to support themselves, they can be deported at any moment.

If the Travelling community want to take advantage of our soft touch nation, then they must become like the rest of us: Law abiding, employed and paying their dues to the state coffers.

Half a world away, American drones in Pakistan kill several German Islamists, Pakistani authorities have said, and ordinary people in Europe feel the tremors. It raises the alarm on this side of the world.

The EU Counter-terrorism Coordinator Gilles de Kerchove, in an interview with euronews, says terrorism is on the move, and calls for better sharing of information to stop potentially dangerous travellers.

De Kerchove: “Al Qaeda wants to attack us hard because they’re still under coalition pressure in Afghanistan, drone attacks. So, they’re looking to project a high profile image through pulling off some major action. What is worrying us the most is extremists entering Europe or the United States, people who were born here or who have one of our member states’ passports, who can therefore slip under the police and intelligence services’ radar. They travel to their holy war zones, whether that’s Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen where we saw an attack last December, or sub-Saharan Africa.”

“Since the ‘jihadists’ travel easily from one country to another, the threat is much more spread out, complex. So, we have to improve how we collect information on people. We have an agreement with the Americans for tracking financial transactions, and the question that’s come up now is whether Europe should have a system like that to collect information on passengers. It raises some questions about privacy that the European Parliament is very concerned about. But as the person in charge, along with several national people in charge, I consider that with this new threat we need new tools, and the PNRPassenger Name Record is just that. We should have it to try to follow the jihadists’ movements.”

Stalemate in the Afghan conflict

Afghanistan remains what some call a theatre of war but behind the scenes all sides are said to be talking about how an eventual peace could play out.

The Afghan government will still have to deal with the Taliban long after foreign troops are gone.

The dealing has already started. The government can offer money, jobs and political posts in return for the Taliban laying down their arms.

When the US-led invasion swept aside Afghanistan’s Taliban rulers, few thought the Taliban would be in a position to negotiate nine years later.

While another war was being fought in Iraq, they regrouped.

In the last three years, the insurgency has intensified and expanded, killing US and NATO troops at a faster rate than at any time since the war began.

“They are very bold. For the last two years, the Taliban have had no reason to hide. So they have been out in the open,” said US intelligence officer Matthew Crawford.

The Taliban is still very much alive at both ends of its operational scale. Recruiting footsoldiers ready for jihad is proving no problem.

And the Quetta Shura, the group’s senior leadership, is based out of reach of foreign fire in Pakistan.

All of which makes a purely military victory unlikely, as Afghan political analyst Haroon Mir explains:
“In any insurgency like the current insurgency in Afghanistan, as long as the Taliban leadership remain in safe havens, in sanctuaries inside Pakistan, they receive financial, logistical support and they could freely move around Pakistan. It is very difficult to defeat this insurgency just by killing rank and file and low level Taliban fighters.”

After nine years, it is military stalemate in Afghanistan. A negotiated settlement looks the most likely prospect. If the Taliban can survive against foreign troops, it will still be in the mix once they have left.

Talks on where they will fit into that mix seem to have already begun.

source: euronews

Israeli Geostrategist Spells out “Demographics Is Destiny” Argument

Israeli Geostrategist Spells out “Demographics Is Destiny” Argument

Lib dems give away more of our hard earned cash

Deputy prime minister Nick Clegg has promised that Britain will double its spending commitments towards maternal health and child mortality in poor countries.
This promise was made to the United Nations, in which Mr Clegg called upon other nations to maintain their commitments to the millenium development goals.
The increased spending will amount to o.7% of gross national income by 2013.
This will amount to £400 million a year and also a further £350 million a year to tackle malaria.
Clegg went on to state that 50,000 mothers a year would be saved from death through childbirth, 250,000 child lives would be saved and ten million couples would be able to take advantage of family planning.
Am i the only one who believes this is just another example of how our government does not represent the interests of its own subjects. In a time of extreme impending budget cuts and unions threatening to bring the country to a standstill, why in the hell is the government doubling the budget of aid so other countries can create more aid dependant lives.
If you cant feed them dont breed them

Warning the taxman is coming!!!!

The taxman could soon be getting his hands on all our hard earned gross pay. Her majesty's revenue and customs has warned that it will be requiring details of gross pay to be sent directly by employers to a central computer.

The taxman would then deduct national insurance, income tax and any student loan repayments before putting the remaining money into our bank accounts.

This news should make us all feel extremely worried considering recent foul ups by the taxman. Millions of people are already fighting with the revenue and customs over errors from a computer glitch that has meant people having to make payments for miscalculated tax errors spanning over two years.

This is yet another example of the big brother state tightening its grip over British citizens. Hopefully sense will be restored when someone eventually questions the Taxman about what happens when inevitably the new computer system, database etc crashes etc. Imagine the worst case scenario, millions of workers not getting paid. Therefore bills, direct debits not getting paid, changes for being overdrawn could lead to financial meltdown.

Or imagine firebrand trade union leaders of present provoking the workers of Revenue and customs to go on strike, with no one getting paid because of a potential strike, they would be able to achieve total dominance over the government who would have to kow tow to their every demand.

lets just hope that this new idea just turns out to be a fantasy of an overzealous jobs worth

Decriminalising the personal use of drugs such as cannabis could enable greater resources to be used to tackle organised criminal networks, a senior police officer has said.

Tim Hollis, chief constable of Humberside Police, said budget cuts had led to officers "prioritising" capabilities towards targeting high-level dealers above those caught with minor amounts of drugs for their own use, it was reported. He told The Observer: "We would rather invest our time in getting high-level criminals before the courts, taking money off them and removing their illicit gains rather than targeting young people." He continued: "We don't want to criminalise young people because, put bluntly, if we arrest young kids for possession of cannabis and put them before the courts we know what the outcome's going to be, so actually it's perfectly reasonable to give them words of advice or take it off them." The chairman of the Association of Chief Police Officers' drugs committee, called for a debate on whether alcohol and nicotine, both lawful drugs, should be incorporated into measures to fight illegal substances. Earlier this week, one of Britain's leading experts on cannabis proposed the idea of introducing a licence to smoke cannabis legally. Professor Roger Pertwee said making cannabis as available as alcohol would prevent drug-related crime, and reduce the chances of people being introduced to harder narcotics. But he cautioned that it might be necessary to prevent vulnerable individuals obtaining the drug. A Home Office spokesman said: "There is clear evidence that cannabis is a harmful drug which can cause damage to mental health in the immediate and longer-term. Even occasional use of cannabis can be dangerous for people with diseases of the circulatory system. "The Government does not believe decriminalisation of cannabis is the right approach. Our priorities are clear - we want to reduce drug use, crack down on drug-related crime and disorder and help addicts come off drugs for good."