Sunday 17 October 2010

The end to welfare dependency in sight? Or are the Tories just using diluted BNP policies


At the core of the BNP's welfare policy is the belief that benefits are  meant to be the state's obligation to support those who are genuinely not in a position to support themselves.This is a guiding principle that will ensure that the system will remain just and humane.

Britain faces a 192 billion Pounds a year bill for social security, with estimated cost of fraud at around 5 billion Pounds a year.

Labour's 13 year rule as led to socialist state induced welfare dependency, that as led to an idle nation. Ask any Polish immigrant why s/he is here, and s/he will tell you that British people are too lazy to work. I know this for a fact, after meeting many eastern European farm labourers, who have all said this. I have tried to argue the case for the British worker, but have sadly come to the same conclusion. The state has deliberately created welfare dependency to make it more profitable for British workers to stay in bed than go to work. Therefore if British workers wont work, the economy then needs immigrant workers to fill the void. Therefore maintaining the myth that the multicultural state is beneficial to Britain.

The existence of welfare dependency culture is evident from the fact that 6 million people live in homes where no one person works.

The BNP's policy on workfare not welfare, is the only way this country can destroy this dependency culture.
The principle is simple, those who receive support also incur obligations. People who genuinely want to work will be provided with the training to get them back into employment.If you receive benefits, you have to provide voluntary work for so many hours week. This should provide renewed motivation, to work rather than to be idle.This policy is about re-educating people to believe that you get money and self esteem from doing an honest days work for decent pay rather than waking up one morning and expecting the state to pay for your existence, just because you were born a British citizen.

There will be only one category for welfare entitlement, those who genuinely deserve it or have earned it. Those who can work but refuse to do so, must face the consequences of their own actions

The  the workfare not welfare program as proven to be extremely successful in America, Australia and even in India

It is equally important that the burden of foreign scroungers be dealt with effectively. These so called asylum seekers, travel through Europe just to get to soft touch Britain, when they have travelled through numerous safe states. This practise must be stopped and one of the ways is to refuse benefits to asylum seeker's who have bypassed numerous safe states just to get here to rape our generosity.

The reason i have written this article, is because of the conservatives new right wing posturing over benefits. Which is ultimately to please increasingly unhappy conservative activists who are sick of Cameron's disgusting new labour socialist conservatism.
The new three strikes and your off benefits rule, has already been shown to be completely useless. Originally DWP officials stated that if you broke the new rule, the claimants benefits would be cut off. The DWP has now back tracked on this, saying that any penalty would depend on how much money the claimant has got, whether they had a family to support and the seriousness of the welfare abuse. This will allow fraudsters to be prosecuted but still claim some benefits, so in total just a complete waste of tax payers money.

new measures to cut fraud and reform the welfare system include:-
- A new national welfare investigation service ( yet another layer of bureaucracy and waste)
- a mobile task force of investigators who can swoop on hot spots of benefits abuse
- sharing data from public and private agencies to track professional fraudsters
- extra powers to seize assets of benefit cheats

Lord Freud said that " when people are convicted we will get back the money we are owed, introduce tough punishments". Now this statement is a load of rubbish if a person is receives benefits in the first place, they must either have no employment or earn below an income band to get additional welfare payouts. In affect any money that has to be paid back in the event of a conviction for fraud will come from welfare payments that the fraudster will still be receiving. The state will not get anything back, it will actually lose money, in fees for prosecution ( courts fees and legal aid) and employment of state officials to investigate the fraud.

It is yet another increase in the big brother state, spying on the activities of people on benefits rather than changing welfare attitudes.
Ultimately the new system will fail, because welfare dependant culture will carry on, fraudsters will just up their game trying to not to get caught out.
That's why the BNP policy on workfare is the only viable option, it will change the culture of dependency and idleness. combined with the BNP's economic policy ( developing British industry and making the country as self sufficient as possible) their will be work for British people, decent work not just flipping burgers.

No comments:

Post a Comment